The Formula for Successful Stakeholder Management

In today’s complex project landscape, especially when working across different teams and functions, I find that managing stakeholders effectively is key to success. Stakeholders can influence the project’s direction in meaningful ways—both positively and negatively. That’s why it’s essential to have a structured approach to assess and prioritize them. Here, I will introduce a Stakeholder Prioritization Model I developed that has been working well for me. This Model quantifies key factors, helping anyone involved in a project develop engagement strategies tailored to each stakeholder’s role and influence.

Getting to Know Stakeholder Attributes

Let’s start with the core attributes that characterize different stakeholders: 

  • Power (P): The level of authority a stakeholder holds within the organization, from 1 (Low) to 5 (High)
  • Influence (I): The stakeholder’s ability to impact project decisions and outcomes, from 1 (Low) to 5 (High)
  • Gain (G): The extent to which the stakeholder benefits from the project’s success, from 1 (Low) to 5 (High)
  • Pain (Pa): How much the project addresses or alleviates the stakeholder’s challenges, , from 1 (Low) to 5 (High)
  • Stakeholder Alignment (S): The degree of alignment or opposition the stakeholder has toward the project 1 (Strongly Oppose) to 5 (Strongly Support).
  • Loudness (N): The likelihood that a stakeholder might cause disruptions or negative impacts if not properly managed 1 (Quiet) to 5 (Very Noisy).

Calculating the Stakeholder Priority Score (SPS)

To quantify and bring together these attributes, I use the following formula to calculate the Stakeholder Priority Score (SPS):

SPS= (( ω1*P+ ω2* I ) × ( ω3*( G + Pa ) + ω4 *N)) / ω5 * S

Where:

    • ω1 to ω5 are weight coefficients assigned to each variable based on its importance in your project context.
    •          All variables are rated on a scale from 1 to 5.
    •          The weights should sum up to 1 for each part of the formula where they are applied.

Suggested Default Weights (Adjustable based on project needs):

    • ω1 (Power): 0.3
    • ω2 (Influence): 0.3
    • ω3 (Gain and Pain): 0.2
    • ω4 (Loudness): 0.2
    • ω5 (Project Support): 0.5

The numerator of the formula calculates the potential impact a stakeholder can have on the project, considering both their ability to affect the project and their motivation to do so.

Power (P) and Influence (I) represent the stakeholder's ability to affect the project's outcome. This component quantifies how capable a stakeholder is of impacting the project, either positively or negatively.

Gain (G) and Pain (Pa) represent the stakeholder's motivation regarding the project's outcomes. This component quantifies how motivated a stakeholder is to engage with the project, and how likely they are to cause disruptions if dissatisfied.

The denominator of the formula, Stakeholder Alignment (S) reflects the stakeholder's current level of support/alignment for the project. Placing this in the denominator inversely relates support to the SPS.

    • Higher Support Lower SPS: Supportive stakeholders require less intensive management.
    • Lower Support Higher SPS: Stakeholders who are unsupportive or neutral may need more attention.

Define Stakeholder Categories and assign Management Strategy

Based on their SPS, categorize stakeholders into three categories:

  • High Priority (SPS > 4): Manage Closely
  • Medium Priority (SPS 2 - 4): Keep Satisfied
  • Low Priority (SPS < 2): Monitor with Minimal Effort

Putting it all together

The table below shows how stakeholders can be prioritized based on their Stakeholder Priority Score (SPS). Each score aligns with a "Management Strategy" that guides how often to engage: high scores go into “Manage Closely,” where regular check-ins and involvement are key, medium scores into “Keep Satisfied,” with occasional updates, and low scores into “Monitor with Minimal Effort,” for the lightest touch. This approach helps tailor engagement based on each stakeholder’s priority level.

Stakeholder

Power (P)

Influence (I)

Gain (G)

Pain (Pa)

Loudness (N)

Stakeholder Alignment (S)

SPS

Priority : Management Strategy

Stakeholder A

4

5

3

2

4

2

4.86

High: Manage Closely

Stakeholder B

2

3

4

5

2

4

1.65

Low: Monitor with Minimal Effort

Stakeholder C

3

2

2

1

3

5

0.72

Low: Monitor with Minimal Effort

Implementation Tips

  • Dynamic Assessment: Stakeholder variables can change. Reassess periodically to adjust strategies.
  • Adjust Weights: Modify weights to reflect your organization/project's unique priorities and risks.
  • Address Loudness Proactively: High Loudness scores indicate potential disruptions. Proactively manage these stakeholders.
  • Leverage Supportive Stakeholders: Even if their SPS is low, supportive stakeholders can champion your project.

 Strategies for Effective Stakeholder Management

Here are specific engagement actions and management strategies for the three categories defined earlier.

1

2

3

Manage Closely
(High Priority)
Keep Satisfied
(Medium Priority)
Monitor with Minimal Effort
(Low Priority)

Engagement Actions:

  • Regular Meetings: Schedule frequent interactions to keep them informed and involved.
  • Involve in Decisions: Include them in key decision-making processes.
  • Promptly Address Concerns: Tackle their issues swiftly to maintain trust.
  • Detailed Updates: Provide comprehensive project updates.

Engagement Actions:

  • Periodic Updates: Offer regular but less frequent project progress reports.
  • Invite to Milestones: Include them in significant project events or reviews.
  • Seek Feedback: Encourage their input on relevant aspects.
  •  Acknowledge Expectations: Ensure their needs are considered.

Engagement Actions:

  • Summaries: Send occasional updates.
  • Monitor Interest and Influence: Stay alert for any changes in their engagement.
  • Responsive Communication: Be available if they reach out.

 Tips:

    • Strategically Allocate Resources: Focus on high-priority stakeholders.
    • Enhance Engagement: Build stronger relationships with key influencers.
    • Mitigate Risks: Proactively address potential challenges.

Benefits of this Stakeholder Prioritization Model

  • Objective Assessment: Provides measurable criteria to evaluate stakeholders, reducing subjectivity.
  • Focused Resources: Helps concentrate efforts on stakeholders who can significantly impact the project.
  • Tailored Engagement: Guides the development of specific management plans for different stakeholder groups.
  • Identify Potential Risks: Highlights stakeholders who may pose risks due to high power, influence, or Loudness.

Final Thoughts:

Effective stakeholder management is a dynamic, ongoing process that’s essential for project success. Quantifying stakeholder variables with the Stakeholder Priority Score (SPS) formula brings clarity to prioritization, helping identify whose needs, expectations, and influence are most impactful. This model provides a reliable guide through the complexities of stakeholder dynamics, supporting projects in reaching their goals with more focus and alignment.

Remember, the key to successful stakeholder management lies in understanding their needs, expectations, and potential impact on your project. Use this model as a guide to navigate stakeholder dynamics and drive your project toward its goals.

Download Stakeholder Management Calculator